Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
“这不是你的错”，还是戳到了我的内心，熊二就是熊二，你不需要做其他人。每个人的特质和挫折经历不同，此刻我只想鼓励你成为你自己，这句台词在《心灵捕手》里也出现过。
带儿子看了4部贺岁档电影，儿子说熊出没最好看...唉，必竟是熊二一样的智商啊，没办法只能打5颗星了
大过年带孩子想选部动画电影，基于以前的印象，在众多IP之中选了熊出没。没错，这是一部精美的电影，人物造型精致，特效精致，音乐精美，分镜和转换也都很精美，搞笑段子也都非常中规中矩。遗憾的是，这部电影的剧情无法让成人感受到故事推进的快感，也无法让人感受到贴近生活的情感共鸣，只能给小朋友看了。相比之下，几年前的变形记就做得很好，切中了亲情的点，让人笑中带泪，是名副其实的合家欢。希望团队能不忘初心，在故事上多下功夫，别浪费了国民IP
疫情宅家陪小朋友看的，感觉国产动漫挺不错的。大主角变憨笨的熊二了，有意思
【三星半】没想到还有致敬玛丽莲梦露的地方，这里还构成了笑点。
剧情和节奏不行，但是特效，分镜，打击感绝对是科幻片中一流水平。感觉是做给带娃看电影的爸爸们看的(its me)，好让他们明年还带娃来看熊大熊二，毕竟动画春节档也内卷严重。
还是被营销号骗进了电影院。低幼的剧情+笑点，所谓的科幻大片场景只有很少一部分，也就打斗片段精彩。
个人感觉可以称为2022年国产第一科幻片！
带小朋友看的，特效很棒。环保有些刻意，但是还说的过去。
有剧情有特效有打斗有教育意义，这不比隔壁几部好看？
陪外甥去看的，出乎意料还可以，比水门桥好看
完全就是大片的赶脚，机甲阿布好酷，战斗画风很棒。集科幻，机甲，动作，超级英雄元素于一体，非常棒的爆米花片，不只是孩子喜欢，我觉得虎年春节档熊熊最棒！
我的人生不能没有一只熊熊！
虽然很多梗是老的，但作为一个不属于80后的IP电影，陪孩子看一次竟然发现还不错
这次出乎我意料之中，熊二演男一，剧情还算可以的，加入了外星生物小猫咪，最后的大战场面有点大，也有点感人，国产动画能拍出这样已经很不错了！
讲真，值得票价，但人物形象设计等抄袭痕迹还是很明显的。
制作精良，有想象力也有情怀。熊二迈入月球的那一脚，旁边是阿姆斯特朗的第一只脚印。地球不适合生存，又遭遇黑洞的解说很有科技感。让对宇宙太空萌芽的小孩可以粗浅的认识太空。当然肯定有逻辑漏洞，但毕竟是个幼儿向的动画片，大家为什么如此苛刻，打那么低分！
最后小女孩和小熊拥抱那里，突然感叹幸好是熊主角，看起来就很治愈很顺理成章，不会有ntr感😂
和表弟一起看的，我觉得还不错。虽然借鉴了许多漫威电影的科技，但片中充斥着正能量，包袱也不错。国产动漫就这样慢慢来吧，只要给孩子们带来的是善良快乐，低龄动漫也没什么不好的。
我外甥拖着我去看的，本以为打算进去玩手机，没想到，有点东西啊，虽然还是子供向哪套，雷同的地方多了点，7分吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
