除非否则的逻辑关系 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 2012

导演: Catherine Gale

剧情介绍

  A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
  Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
  Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
  With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
  'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
  Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?

评论:

  • 岳帅凝然 5小时前 :

    当然,这只是可能……

  • 仕林 0小时前 :

    女主长得有点神似Natalie Portman和Blake Lively

  • 养静慧 3小时前 :

    这未婚夫不靠谱啊 都说被跟踪了还假装没事人样的 只顾着自己的工作前途 垃圾。女的也恋爱脑 语言都不通就跟着人一起了 白天还独守空房 不理解这两个人

  • 双佳悦 2小时前 :

    女人的直觉永远正确,真的只有girls help girls,任何对立面性别只会觉得女的大惊小怪和发疯,最后很带感!大快人心!

  • 向娟巧 0小时前 :

    感觉故事里主要人物们情感流露的分寸感很好!

  • 天翰 2小时前 :

    当然,这,也只是可能……

  • 富察迎丝 6小时前 :

    略微多冗长了些 看不下去的即视感扑面而来 类型化严重

  • 嵇冬易 9小时前 :

    最后的反杀看得我一愣一愣的,这个设定让人一头雾水

  • 厉宏扬 1小时前 :

    然后到了后面,对面楼的男人终于漏出真面目,开始了杀人,不过杀女主的时候居然留了一手,这就很说不过去了。

  • 婧菡 1小时前 :

    差点和《偷窥者》搞起来 都是同样的一对男女 同样《后窗》式的神秘感 却是截然不同的故事 两部我都很喜欢 果然心理惊悚才是最精彩的

  • 吉勇 3小时前 :

    关注女性安全问题。结尾做了几处反转还是很有可看性的,氛围感做得好。

  • 寿湛英 6小时前 :

    Sundance genre film always much fun

  • 哈小凝 4小时前 :

    压抑的气氛做的很棒;专注了被凝视的感觉,其他的都被弱化了;这一枪太假了,如果女主挂了好一些,这样为了爽而爽反而不好;摄影可以更好点?

  • 司马玲珑 1小时前 :

    这电影拍的真省事,全片有内容的就最后二十分钟……前面一个多小时全是猜忌加漫无目的的空景,旅游宣传片了属于。

  • 单碧春 3小时前 :

    那个老公真是又蠢又窝囊,最后一幕还没反应过来,像个傻子似的在那杵着,摊上这么个玩意真是够呛!

  • 希静枫 5小时前 :

    敢不敢大胆一些,别设定一个双商下线的丈夫角色来拖延剧情,或者就是女主的一场臆想最后杀了无辜的邻居。电影不能求鱼得鱼!

  • 仝曼丽 9小时前 :

    剧情生搬硬套,全靠陈词滥调推进。别人是后窗惊魂,你整出后窗对峙。杀手动机不明,女主被杀后流了那么多血,竟不服导演剧情强行站起反杀...结尾的反转令人意外!构图审美基本在线,不过比较中规中矩,有种千篇一律的美感。稍+1⭐

  • 彬璐 9小时前 :

    如果你感觉被监视了,就一定被监视了;如果你的小区里有人被杀了,那么一定有人想杀你;如果你向丈夫解释了,那么他一定不会相信;如果你报警了,那警察一定没用;如果有人监视你,那他一定要杀你;但如果你是女的,即使被砍了脖筋也可以击毙歹徒。用多个弱联系强行构建想要的结果,典型的滑坡谬误电影。

  • 吉彬 0小时前 :

    本来以为是个深片,没想到走成了爽片。人呐,还是得靠自己。

  • 宋清宁 0小时前 :

    今年出了这么多女性受难事件,女性应该看看这部电影,获得力量。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved