Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
为啥评分这么低呀，主线故事非常完整，人物不多但是出场都有自己的线，剧情百转千回 把谁是凶手的悬念压倒了最后
很多电影爱用角色在浴缸或者水下闭息以致“窒息”的桥段。
范少勋给我一种十年后依然在看十年前的校园疼痛文学的感觉，莫允雯always是有破碎面的精英，三个主角里面可能温贞菱的表现最好，贡献了98分钟里一大半有效内容
啊 我看到中间就猜到可能是她老公…一般还行
中规中矩看到开头猜到结尾，三颗星给熟悉的Queen B和熟悉的斯普利特。
嫖客跟妓女谈感情，或者妓女跟嫖客说我爱你，都是自欺欺人，自我感动。
就是中规中矩，所有反转都猜到了，感觉就是把某一集的犯罪美剧扩成一部电影，但演员很养眼，女主一个人的演技也是可以撑起一部电影的，适合吃饭之类的刷
今年🐴的華語片品質真的都一言難盡😢… 造型指導'許力文'，聲音設計'杜篤之' 感覺前輩們真的盡力了… 溫貞菱入圍女配角 算是有演出酒家女的感覺… 范少勳的老鴇角色 換劉冠廷來演可能更有味道… 納豆延續[同學麥娜絲]的怪宅造型，算是本片比較自然的一個笑點… 所謂'大尺度'淪為噱頭，'性'的場面穿插得非常莫名和沒必要… 建議編導重新檢視劇本結構和每一場戲的功用… 都更計劃/'小姐'產業/美術館(小三懷孕) 三條線的情節，裡面的每個角色 都非常刻板窠臼… 要寫'人的寂寞' 卻也只是停留在情緒(情慾)宣洩… 觀影過程非常煎熬… 輔導金拜託不要真的一扶就倒😢… (2021TGHFF)
几个亮点：几经反转的结局、QueenB演技在线、新认识了阿拉伯帅大叔
男主是个皮条客，女主是画廊的老板，也是某个大富豪的婚外情人，他们相遇相识，但很难说是相恋。
其实可以更好 好多细节bug点太多 禁不起推敲 房东的监视室 外面的监控能把警察男和路人搞混 最后强行反转 何必留着自己杀害对象的珠宝
不想一个人就一定要用情欲去填满吗 电影确实缺乏一点意义 如果只是为了刻画声色时代的颓废孤独 那么色调+女主颜还是合格的 但是仅此而已 没有一个人得到拯救
不想一个人就一定要用情欲去填满吗 电影确实缺乏一点意义 如果只是为了刻画声色时代的颓废孤独 那么色调+女主颜还是合格的 但是仅此而已 没有一个人得到拯救
翻拍韩片 A Hard Day / 走到尽头，有几个场景简直一样。
没有贯彻去拍情绪。拆迁线和后两场激情戏都可以删掉，温温的尺度戏给我留下！女主叫小姐陪唱有点可爱。
看情节，就知道是小说改编。导演故布疑阵比较明显，给的伏笔镜头也明显。后来的进度条让观众得出了答案……
故事简单，不要详细推敲，看看就好，演员的戏不错。
看到最后生出一种打完游戏忍不住给打得最菜的点个赞的那种心情（我不管等可以自由暴走以后我第一个要去的就是Croatia
一段接一段的悬疑情节看着好累啊。看了评论区才知道是翻拍的，这么重要的信息为什么不公示出来？
.....................
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
