Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
虽然觉得影帝比北野武颜值高了太多，但我还是喜欢影帝w
千篇一律的日影调子，三分之一已经看不下了。
师娘的地方很好，影帝很努力了，但也可能是北野武只能成为梗却不能是别人演绎的，放弃模仿才更容易演成吧。
好好哭啊…一路上最让人感动的不还是始终存在着的真挚情感吗？
“我是谐星，八嘎牙路！”2021年底为数不多把我眼泪骗出来的电影，真的是诚意之作。整个故事的结构不死板但又不觉得混乱，全程都能很入戏。PS:就是踢踏舞一出现就让我想到海澜之家男人的衣柜😂
好喜欢北野武啊，有这么好的师父真是幸运，「不要讨好观众，由你来告诉观众什么是有趣的。」以及想起了老爷子自己在《红鳉鱼》里演的教落语的那个师父。
''如果想哭 可试试对嘉宾满座 说个笑话''
标准商业片来说是好看的，面瘫是中年才开始的不是年轻就有，一点儿都不专业
剧作有些生硬刻意生涩的地方 明显新手导演编剧（剧团一人在综艺里经常见，第一次知道还可以做编剧导演）不过这段师徒情本身非常动人 大泉洋演的好 柳乐优弥刻意地模仿反而有点失去自己的光彩 北野武歌声里的故事感无可取代
好莱坞味道过于浓重了 这么讲一个日本传记片 我不是很能接受 难道北野武可以？！我不相信….
两次重启人生，在戏剧路上奔驰的男儿物语。不过，与其说是北野武的个人传记，镜头聚焦在他的学徒时代、因此更接近“法兰西座”的群像剧。深见千三郎的个人魅力十足，活脱脱一名刀子嘴豆腐心、不惜施教的伯乐，也是我见过的大泉洋演技发挥得最好的一次；柳乐优弥对北野武的面部神态模仿更是惟妙惟肖到惊人的地步，痞子模样内心对踢踏舞、短剧和漫才的激情，纵使时代的浪潮也没能浇灭。
看之前对这种类似建生祠的操作还是有点疑惑的，虽然认同北野武确实颇有成就。看完发现它其实更像是师父深见千三郎的传记，是对起于微时的怀念，某个时代的浅草，剧场最后的荣光。影帝演得真的好像，扮老的形象还以为是本人出演。
3.5；每个喜剧背后都有一个悲剧的核。不要讨好观众，要告诉观众什么才是好笑的。煽情的部分稍微少一点就更好了。
很平庸，毕竟这是滚烫的人生。差不多是从在后台跳踢踏舞才算有感觉。大泉洋比柳乐优弥好太多，柳乐优弥表演痕迹太重，太执着于北野武的招牌动作。好看的是真实的人生。
“不管在舞台上怎么装疯卖傻 ，（谐星）下了台就要让人觉得帅”
“没人求你看，有得看是你的荣幸，给我乖乖闭嘴看下去”
“这钱付完车费还有余的话 来找我 把零钱还我”“师父 火葬场的人跟我说 已经烧了一半了 所以只用付一半钱”
高跟鞋的那段太对我的点，哭了。看完缓了很久就觉得命运是很捉弄人的。
感觉yagira学老爷子嘴角抽搐还挺像的，踢踏舞和门门的歌算是里面我喜欢的桥段，还有最后，的确很打动。其余略显平庸。
阿武师傅出事后，还在灵堂前讲漫才，保持谐星的幽默感，在某种程度上继承了师傅深见千三郎对艺术的追求。“我是谐星，八嘎呀路！”其实没有看过太多北野武导的电影，但北野武演的电影看过不少，具体认知中北野武就是个倔强的小老头，能说点真话，也是真的有才，可以为所欲为。实际上这不是北野武第一部关于漫长的电影，对于身份认知，从本片中看，北野武一直很认可自己作为谐星的身份。愿历经千帆，归来仍是少年。柳乐优弥长得一点都不像北野武，角色就是阿武（总有种魂穿武则天的感觉），阿武很好的表现出北野武痴的一面，对表演艺术的痴；对师傅深见千三郎的敬，实际上出走半生，却一直铭记恩师教诲。电影故事后半段稍微有点脱节，节奏一下子就没有前面那么流畅，但是日式独有的细节一点不缺，在炎炎夏日，看看大佬是如何怀念恩师的，还是极好的！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
