On a hot summer afternoon in New York, Emma Jones gossips with other neighbors in her residential building about the affair that Mrs. Anna Maurrant and the milkman Steve Sankey are having. When the rude and unfriendly Mr. Frank Maurrant arrives, they change the subject. Meanwhile, their teenage daughter Rose Maurrant is being sexually pressured by her married boss Mr. Bert Easter. She does however very much like her kind young Jewish neighbor Sam, who has a serious crush on her.
The next morning, Frank Maurrant tells his wife that he is traveling to Stamford on business. Mrs. Maurrant meets the gentle Sankey in her apartment, but out of the blue Frank comes back home. He realizes his wife is upstairs with Sankey, and runs upstairs. We hear shots and see the two men struggling as Sankey tries to escape through the window. Maurrant runs out with a gun. He has killed Sankey and fatally wounded his wife.
Maurrant is apprehended and is led away by police. He apologizes to his daughter Rose, who will now have to take care of herself and her young brother without either parent. Rose's boss offers once again to set her up in her own apartment, but she refuses. Then she sees Sam, and tells him she wants to leave the city. Sam pleads with her to let him go with her, but she tells him it will be better for the two of them to have a couple of years apart before they consider becoming a couple. Rose walks off down the street by herself.
笑死我了，全程都在“这是儿童片不要认真不要认真”“哇人不如狗系列”里来回切换。这不比国产烂片香哈哈哈哈哈
大社会历史背景下的小童家庭生活流。前方的fork不可避免，向左还是右，已经忘了哪个good 哪个bad ，留下的和迁徙的，都有值得纪念的人生。。小男孩演的好！。。BGM用的有点过多，总是把情绪荡上去，没有安静的力量。老电影穿插也不少，可能导演也是迷影怀旧的。局部影像构图挺好，黑白片必须找点优势。。。就，不知为啥大家把这部跟《罗马》对比，难道黑白的形式，历史社会题材就一定要比比？评:3.7星
跟上两部阿婆的比也还是自恋，但是粉丝如我，对肯爵圈地自萌的容忍度其实要高很多；个人/集体回忆碎片的取舍还是有点问题，整体观感偏乏味。
不算坏，但大概本想拍出诗意，结果看到是只是悬浮。
虽然零碎，但看得出所有那些细节都源自极其私人且真实的时代记忆。可惜最后商店骚乱和酒吧歌舞这两场戏安排得太突兀了，折损了整个故事的质感。
很私人，但还是勾起了一些共同回忆的，比如爷爷奶奶，抢劫超市，飘和星际迷航。“爱尔兰人必须离去，不然世界上其他地方就没有酒吧了”. 但整个刻意黑白和最后的字幕又太掉价了….Van Morrison好听
（豆瓣真空期补标9月末-12月）廉价的设计感，做成黑白色调就是自信不足的表现。
导演的私电影。黑白画面镜头很柔和，没有深刻说教，这是人的生活
这几年冲奥电影的共性就是“nothing happened”。
头一次看汪汪队立大功，我从来没想到狗狗们的装备能拯救地球d(ŐдŐ๑)儿子在旁边乐，我在旁边惊的目瞪口呆……太哇塞了
因为是私人记忆 所以还原“它”就好
因为是私人记忆 所以还原“它”就好
儿童电影，不能以成人的标准来衡量。小孩子喜欢才是硬道理。
2.5。布拉纳再次用村歌电影证明了它的一塌糊涂和完全失控的局面。电影偶尔有一丝灵光乍泄，比如唱歌，奔跑，躲枪的设计，这些是演员赋予电影的。而整个电影充满一个制作者的自恋和鄙夷态度，没有说教却罗里吧嗦在说教，没有zz却一直搞擦边球。请勿碰瓷《罗马》了，这个跟它的区别不再是低劣的模仿效作，而是差别于条条大路通罗马。这种东西能捞的一个导演提名简直是unbelievable~
What works还是1969年北爱尔兰这个历史性的背景，把影片的深度和维度都拔高了，(thanks to当年写过Derry Girls 3000字essay 还算有了解)。Kenneth Branagh再次证明是个mediocre导演；摄影方面的deep focus, 构图有点公民凯恩的风格，但挺不适合这种家庭回忆的drama... still, rooting for Caitriona Balfe to get that Oscar!
匠气重得离谱，文本干到发瘪。经验提炼的有效性与情境构建的组织力高度欠佳，以为黑白影像与怀旧金曲的复古联动产生化学反应必定可爱且极易动人，拍个人被社会裹挟汹涌为时代浪潮约莫要自诩卡隆附体，太多构图与机位的强设计却是藏不住的小聪明四溢。所谓童年与乡愁情结在此亦不过是一系列符号堆砌与硬拗造型的副产品，内里充斥的尽是傻到鼻子冒泡而不自知的无节制自我陶醉和意淫。每场戏都像是面镜子 反射出的只有躲在摄影机后面暗自窃喜的布拉纳：看老子多会调度。
异乡人关于童年的吉光片羽，不高级却有真挚的况味。
阿奇戏份太多了吧！毛毛的戏份太少了！配音太烂了。汪汪队居然靠卖周边的钱盖了那么高一栋楼笑死。感觉画面变精致了再搭配笨笨的剧情就好奇怪
从头到尾看得津津有味
崽子四岁，超级喜欢汪汪队。陪他看完以后感觉比剧版好很多。狗狗不再只是勇敢，他们也会害怕，也会沮丧，也会担心。其中以阿奇的情感转换最为明显。“我不是因为你可怜才收养你，而是我知道你一定会成为一个英雄”。最后皆大欢喜，孩子慢慢也认识了狗狗的更多面。所以啊，评判一个儿童电影，就问孩子喜不喜欢。我家小孩儿一个多小时没动地儿没说话，全程看下来意犹未尽，这在他看来就是好的儿童电影。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
