Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
街上高中生都比男主心理年龄大🙃吴彦祖一口二手北京腔是什么鬼🙃最讨厌这种女人穿最少衣服没事就哭男人一套接一套西装拯救世界的设定
「那就跟我講個快樂的故事，但要在中間結束」
找一帮优秀演员出演，配上故弄玄虚的高概念和看似复杂的叙事结构，会拯救一个无趣且老套、简单且浅薄的故事吗？答案是不会。
有点大炮打苍蝇的感觉，背景设定还是可以的，但，但，故事格局太小了。影像风格诺兰味十足，但却少了太多锐利。
终究还是爱情胜过一切，永远的停留在那最炽烈，最浓情的一刻，没有世俗打搅，没有现实浇冷水，最朴素的愿望。让爱情保留那一刻的美妙弧光，毕竟人人都知道，顶峰过去后就是深渊的现实。那一刻的隽永确实令人迷醉，不断的重复，最后还是挠到我的泪腺，让我写下这段话。故事一般，就是为了爱情这一刻的弧光，写的整个剧本吧。这一刻击穿屏幕，击溃了我的心，值得五星，能以点破面的片子都值得赞赏。PS：狼叔声音太性感啦！！！太爱跨越记忆，跨越时空对话的感觉了，爱死了。让我想起了《上海堡垒》，也是为了一段话写了整个故事“这条短信在中国移动的信号台之间穿梭，找不到它的目的地，就像是永不消逝的电波，穿行在空无一人的城市里。我想象着在那个沉眠于地下的城市里，那条短信是个虚无飘渺的女孩”
想跟休叔的同事一起对他翻白眼。披着科幻外衣的俗套侦探爱情故事。明明是挖掘记忆，非要以可视化的全息影片呈现，还是上帝视角的舞台剧形式，导致完全没有可信性。
两人打斗后，毁容男手被钢琴夹住，沉入地板下↓，一抹阳光照射，摄影简直太强了，水下名场面！
里面不是没有好想法，但可以说全没做出来。导演技法业余不说，本行的编剧居然连类型都能写飞，爱情？科幻？悬疑？动作？全无章法东拼西凑，交代不清旁白硬上，故事讲完十几分钟了还在那整MV拗造型。看的难受得我觉得自己就是彦祖说的那个“poor龟孙子”。。。
非常有趣的赛朋设定，记忆读取的一些小细节也很机智，但是故事和大段的台词有点过于俗气腻歪了。
6分。这其实是部爱情片啊~~~金刚狼化身大情圣，追寻着逝去的爱人~~这故事实在是太老套了。最关键一点，是Rebecca Ferguson竟然玩了一手自杀？？看到这里我嘴都合不拢了，就不能搞点花样嘛？？迈阿密变威尼斯的想法还是不错的，但这个和所谓的大战等等背景故事根本就没发挥，完全浪费了世界观设定。吴彦祖的造型不错，但演这么个小喽啰完全没必要吧？？
3.5/5 緬懷過往的機器所衍生出的一連串懸疑追查，基本上就是有些俗套的科幻懸疑片，概念與世界觀算不錯，但是用懸疑片做包裝，20年前已經有關鍵報告，不過這部是更為純粹的愛情故事，狼叔為了一見傾心的弗格森所做出的一連串追查與自我犧牲，整部片只有結尾沒落入俗套，反類型的選擇永遠活在過去，沉浸在回憶本身，直到將死的那一刻，結尾是全面啟動的反面，但是對角色來說，如果能幸福的活著，即便那是假的，只是回憶本身，似乎也不留遺憾了，畢竟人都有選擇幸福的方式。世界觀設定很有西部世界導演的style，作為第一部劇情長片表現也不算差，就是希望劇情可以再更加新穎些，吳彥祖的表演很讚，英語混中文的表演很狂，同時又看的很爽，導演應該看過新警察故事吧哈哈，直到現在吳彥祖還是適合演這種瘋癲反派。
有点乱。一段段的回忆没顺序，再加上我不是一次看完的。三星吧。
这是一部被低估的好片，还是值得观看的，虽然节奏有些缓慢，独白有些老套。
saint joe 圣祖。金刚狼也只能接盘阿祖。
设定很好，构思也很好，但是我打心眼里不喜欢这个故事。是讲阴谋还是讲爱情，选一个说清楚吧。爱情不让人觉得深刻，倒是让这故事里的人花了一辈子去记住。
这配置从最后的成片来看着实一般般，有点失望。开头的画面质感很好，“水城”很美，核心概念的设定：“追忆”也不错。可惜本子实在不吸引人，悬疑感很弱，前期节奏慢，最后的反转也根本谈不上惊艳。其实就是一借科幻外壳的爱情片。吴彦祖戏份也太少了😅以为是主演结果还是打个酱油就领盒饭了，不过帅还是帅的。
「什麼樣的故事」
哎？我刚发现这个导演是诺兰的弟媳妇儿……啊……
男主的人物形象是不错的，但故事讲的是个什么玩意儿
尼克·班尼斯特是一名私家侦探。他的工作主要是帮助客户重拾遗忘的记忆，沉湎于幽暗诱人的逝去时光。尼克生活在因海平面上升而已经半淹没的迈阿密，然而当他接手了新客户梅之后，他的生活永远改变了。一次简单的寻回失物之任务，演变成一出危机重重的惊天迷局。尼克努力寻找着梅的失踪真相，而与整座城市存亡息息相关的巨型阴谋也逐渐浮现。他必须争分夺秒，破解回忆迷局，但他真的能在阴谋将自己吞噬前，找到梅失踪的真相吗？同时尼克也必须直面一个终极难题：为了留住你最爱的人，你到底愿意付出什么？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
