Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
建议下次拍MV。
人物的塑造有多单薄呢，只能说刘浩存的演技完美演绎了她的角色。就这已经是女主角了，配角基本等于工具人。
5.韩寒，远离爱情片和县城吧，你大少爷，你真拍不出来，你拍的县城青年像傻子，贾樟柯刚拍电影的时候都不这么拍，你是不是疯了？
你很难定义《四海》的风格，它前半段有海岛风光，像是日式小清新青春片；它后半段像任何一部拙劣的现实主义题材剧情片，说实话，显得非常失真（当然这也是韩寒一以贯之的文本设计）。
我很穷，那你要继续撩他，这些我就能有吃早饭。
和一个男的看这部电影，他说：“你看刘浩存眼里有星光”，我说：“那是美瞳！”
关于机车与梦想，阿耀这个角色真的挺打动人心，把对梦想的执着，对万物的热爱，暗恋的情愫和懵懂，一心一意想对欢颂的好，和小惊喜，演绎出了每个人的心境。关于海风与故乡，对奶奶的爱，对父亲的期待和失望，最后从城市中回到家乡，与过年的主题特别呼应。关于爱与哀愁，其实结局我还蛮意外，以为会是一个happy ending。结果却有些悲伤。这部电影有很多欢笑，也有很多遗憾，演员演技都特别棒。很推荐！
我觉得没有网上评价的那么烂，是韩寒一贯的风格。可能生活就是这样荒诞的，一门之隔的理想生活，压在身上的巨债，牵不了手的女孩，飞跃不了的珠江...理想主义在现实面前只能一次次碰壁。想起一段对话“生命只有一次”“太好了”
虽然台湾青春偶像剧
和一个男的看这部电影，他说：“你看刘浩存眼里有星光”，我说：“那是美瞳！”
很青春啊 就算是两小时加长版本的MV看了也很舒服啊
韩寒的片子，食之无味弃之可惜。算了还是标记下吧。
怎么了？
为了结尾的悲剧，前面铺垫得一塌糊涂，这个感情线简直让人莫名其妙。不过让某女郎演还真是到位了。就是这种感觉，我就吊着你，最后咱俩一拍两散。
①能忍受女主是刘浩存的，韩导选她拍这部电影是她被爆之前。
没想到男主是周兴哲………………… 以前只听他的歌没看过他的人……… 虽然后面忍住和自己说 别以为男主你长得像我本科导师我就可以不骂你胆小鬼…… 但是结局过了火车道把我一个猝不及防看懵了……… 😠被鹿撞过的感觉我知道😠（虽然但是我在男主飞车回去见女主的时候很怕给我最后来一出火车一驰而过的狗血元素）还好还好谢天谢地！周兴哲你很会诶😬
大型韩寒语录朗读会现场。相比起尴尬的台词和莫名其妙的运镜，咱浩存妹妹的演技甚至可圈可点了呢。最本质的问题是拍小镇童话没有任何环境和人物的辨识度，除了赛摩托还是赛摩托，所有的主角加起来还没有黄晓明演的showta哥有共情点。
上中学的时候，每天抽屉里都有不同早餐，来自不同班级的男同学，回忆杀，青春的画面很美好，感激自己也曾被不同的人小鹿乱撞的喜欢过。
比我想得好看一点，那里面的饭团🍙看起来挺好吃的哈哈
看完只想吃早餐，我也想吃小黄瓜加鲔鱼的清爽饭团啦！想到高中也会有学长给我买一定要早去才买得到的包子诶！还会在我数学书上写“加油”，虽然现在想起来再也没有什么感觉，但当时还是蛮心动的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
