Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
意义不明的一场犯罪。这豪华的卡司阵容多少有些老龄化了。。。
虽然案情没头没尾，但有长泽雅美真的是太好了
三星半。很久很久没看日影了其实还不错吧，设定以及双线交汇挺有意思的，不过也猜到了结局毕竟日影套路就这些了…不谈认不认同角色行为是温情还是矫情，还是小感动了一下下，谁不想要我们十块钱这样的老婆和妈呢TvT
东野圭吾犯罪动机的复杂性，在这里出于种种原因被简单化了。然后就剩下支离破碎的天王耍帅和各路人马配合。 两个小时，如坐针毡。木村还是帅的，长泽还是美的，但电影是失败的。
整体风格和假面饭店类似，案件很糟糕，剧情很普通，很难说好，不过卡司还是很强。
试图合理化或者给自以为的父母疼爱精神找到借口。其实是另一种自私观念的体现。大段的煽情实在是应该节制一些。
把无血缘之羁绊拍成了过于异样的日常，摆出三位父亲两位母亲这样的奇特组合却又任性安排插叙的闯入来加剧时间的混乱度，再满溢的温情也会被这人为操控的命运女神消磨殆尽。而这部被誉为平成最后的女性主义大作在影视化的道路上，最大的绊脚石竟是作为剧情核心的梨花女士所带来的的夸张演绎，这种反差让人在灵堂与礼堂的时空衔接中感叹这接力棒幕后的虚伪。隐瞒十多年的母爱真相纵使有重病背书也无法抹去继母玩弄感情的放浪事实，而所有以父之名引向温馨大团圆的原谅都将成为刺向人情动脉的残酷一击。
还好我没看原作，要是我花几个小时还不能倍速地看这么一个故事，而且还没有十元和咩的美颜加成的话，我是真的会生气的！
总之，打发时间随便看看吧，来都来了😕
虽然案情没头没尾，但有长泽雅美真的是太好了
如果拍得好一点的话应该是能拍好的（我在说什么废话（咩咩太可爱噜
改太多了，但是全程有永野芽郁看，倒也称不上难看。
为了十元勉强给三星吧，剧本敢不敢这么乱写？！随便看看吧
一条线是单亲爸爸田中圭抚养永野芽郁至高三、永野芽郁喜欢钢琴帅哥，另一条线是石原里美和大森南朋结婚又离婚，石原找了个有钱绅士爷爷抚养大森和前妻的小孩；戏剧性发生了，两条时间线的交错点在于小女孩就是永野芽郁，故事就拼起来了，片名爱的接力棒。好了影片前半段比较精彩的部分结束了，后半段就没啥看点了
凶手：实不相瞒，这家酒店的服务真让我感动，于是我决定跟上一集的凶手一样，回来返个场。
镜头语言也很好，色调就很日系治愈
客串阵容依旧豪华，比前作的伏笔性更强了点。但感觉最后的结局还是很牵强，有些情节和剧情主线放一起很突兀。不过看到两种职业操守的价值观碰撞，涉及服务业，片中展现出的极致。
后半部略显拖沓了……总体节奏不是特别好，但还算是不错的影片。
再也不会看这系列了，如果还有的话，希望没有。
故事太童话了，如果在以往可能会因此减分，可是在频繁看到负能量新闻的情况下，看到童话可以对人有所抚慰吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
