Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
整片有种迷人的气质，拍得很美。软科幻，一直贯穿的是爱和关怀。
大智度论中有典故如此“如有一人，受使远行，独宿空舍。夜中有鬼担一死人来着其前，复有一鬼逐来，瞋骂前鬼：“是死人是我物，汝何以担来？”先鬼言：“是我物，我自持来。”后鬼言：“是死人实我担来！”二鬼各捉一手争之。前鬼言：“此有人可问。”后鬼即问：“是死人谁担来？”是人思惟：“此二鬼力大，若实语亦当死，若妄语亦当死，俱不免死，何为妄语？”语言：“前鬼担来。”后鬼大瞋，捉人手拔出着地，前鬼取死人一臂拊之即着。如是两臂、两脚、头、胁，举身皆易。于是二鬼共食所易人身，拭口而去。其人思惟：“我人母生身，眼见二鬼食尽，今我此身尽是他肉。我今定有身耶？为无身耶？若以为有，尽是他身；若以为无，今现有身。”如是思惟，其心迷闷，譬如狂人”
今年最打动我的电影之一。未来和克隆只是设定，其实讲的是人类和自己一生的和解和告别，是需要静下心来好好看的电影，是把大权郑重交托在演员手里的电影。阿里演得很棒，奥卡菲纳也演的很棒。
感觉像是淋了一场秋日的小雨，淡淡的惆怅和莫名的忧伤
我觉得这个设想其实很沉重，大概就是善意的谎言和残忍的真相的博弈，主人公最后选择了善意的谎言，因为对妻子和孩子的爱。但我想我应该会选择残酷的真相，因为我觉得谎言永远都是谎言，人总是需要面对的，everything。
Apple在这部电影里要兜售的内容太多了：生活方式、生命观念、对待记忆的态度…一切与科技息息相关，也早已超过了之前出品内容里的Apple产品覆盖。无论做产品，还是做内容，Apple最终还是在做上层建筑。
节奏很慢很慢。主要是讨论。我们需要讨论，我们需要探索。
涉及伦理纲常和人格侵犯，很多事情都那么模糊，最明朗坚定的是贯穿整篇是爱。克隆本是一个科幻的主题，却用温情的故事来讲述，用本体的视角去窥探，仿佛Jack不是克隆人，就是卡梅隆身体的延续、为卡梅隆完成他以后的人生。
Jack温柔贴心，是因为Cameron的温柔贴心
全片最有科技含量的地方就是这神乎其神的记忆移植。
不多bb
虽然科幻得很玄幻，但是平实的叙述，精湛的演技，冲淡了基本上不可能的科技成就，很感人。
是我看过最感人最温情的科幻片，也让我在想我们拿克隆技术到底为什么 延长寿命还是单纯代替自己
781 竟然没有玩常规的“老婆也是复制人”或“Cameron本身也是复制人套路”。 奥卡菲娜的角色，明显比《尚气》那个有意思多了。
十分钟就能讲完的小故事抻两个小时，中间还穿插了二十年前知音读者烂鸡汤，真无聊。
题材不新鲜了，但 Ali 真的适合怼脸特写，他的高级丧脸真是所有文艺片通行证。
怎么港，3.5吧，不够深，但主题是我喜欢的，如果讨论更深点就好了。只是逻辑上连这么高超的克隆技术都有了，为什么连癌症的那个基因不能直接被编辑，不合理，而且还没安乐死要在那里等死？
电影不错，那种细腻感情的描述让人心动，克隆人的道德困境并不会有答案，里面湖边别墅的装修风格几乎每一处都让我喜欢。
尽管不是很喜欢主人公的性格，天鹅们还是天鹅
为站在小房间凝视“我爱你”再加一星。是我非常喜欢的主题，但是聚焦点却不在科技与伦理，而是不带judge地展示一个人选择如何离开与被遗忘。It’s hard being left behind，只有狗记得你。爱情本质上还是利己：爱更久，存在更久。我太喜欢马赫沙拉的脸了。结尾正好是圣诞节。🎄🎄🎄
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
