Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
两位老人演得很好，看得我眼泪直流。女主的感情戏和有关情欲的表达跟父亲患病的那条线有些割裂。喜欢公园里的那个镜头，配乐特别好，不满不少。整部电影很真诚，映后交流导演也很真诚，有不足，但这样的片子必须打五星，支持！
有一说一嗷，我一般不给这么低的分，但是霸权社+荒木哲郎+虚渊玄+小畑健+泽野弘之，这么好的配置，你给我整出个这玩意儿。。
音乐是真好听，画面是真好看（有些掉san画面除外…）剧情也是真一般✋
拍本土家庭题材剧本能不能先回家给妈看看？多少也符合点现实生活，太尬了…
无聊且生硬。
画面，作画，分镜，配乐都是顶级的。就是剧情挺抽象的，分割开每个段落其实都还不错，但是连贯在一起就让人觉得意义不明，脚本优秀一点的话其实是能封神的。
原来平遥这些新人导演真的有高出水平线之上的作品，太原农村老宅的场景实在让我有点没绷住；庆幸能在大荧幕看到这样一部作品
观看之前故意没看任何评价，看完来看评分不出我所料，剧情着实仓促➕俗套😐，人物一个个还没支棱起来就要结束了，wit的作画很不错，泽野的配乐更是无可挑剔。然后我想说不愧是是荒木哲郎监督，这喷射靴和分镜还有音效简直跟立体机动装置没差，还有kaji和井上麻里奈的配音更是让我不得不联想到...🤔老虚的剧本看这结局也是没毛病。网飞也是只会投钱了🥲4星是看在作画配乐舒服点給的，实际不值。对了，eve的片头曲和リリあ的片尾曲也不错的
好人设，好画工，强班底，做出一个介于俗、雅和诗意之间的四不像动态ppt。这部作品的唯一价值就是，你能从中截出几张漂亮的图用作桌面墙纸。
老虚跌下神坛，音乐最出彩。
最大的问题是多数戏都显“假”：人物的神态台词，环境的布景打光有明显的设计和表演感，看着真的很尴尬。小问题也有：跳跃的情节，单薄的角色，不明觉厉的长镜头和超现实，基本都无助于情绪代入。
某导演的mv动画电影是垃圾，模仿垃圾的作品也只能是垃圾，白白浪费了人生宝贵的100分钟，还不如多看几集小新。
但霸权社不愧为霸权社，实力摆在那就是厉害，画面精致是必然，大型动作场面更是十分流畅，在失重的废土城市里自由奔跑，是这部电影唯独给我带来的幻想。
搞出这么一出
画面好看，角色可爱，只是不甜还腻。
剧情2星，一坨屎
说这是一部MV更确切，音乐不错，画面很炫，适合在影院观看，故事大纲还是不错的，但太不细腻了，女主角塑造的也不够丰满，用着萤火之森的点子，但女主消失的时候一点效果都没有，这就挺失败的
画面不差但是密恐患者的地狱，个人很难给出高分。
但霸权社不愧为霸权社，实力摆在那就是厉害，画面精致是必然，大型动作场面更是十分流畅，在失重的废土城市里自由奔跑，是这部电影唯独给我带来的幻想。
娃说看到最后小诗消失想哭了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
