The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
我觉得拍一个凯奇这些年怎么拍烂片还钱的心路历程要更有趣。只有开头那点拍的符合预期。
虽然像过家家，但是充满戏剧性，凯奇彻底翻身？
影中人玩得好开心……
社会边缘人物组成的临时家庭，拐卖孤儿，堕胎与反堕胎，导演真的给了社会上的孤儿一个回答，谢谢你来到这个世界上。
导演太温柔太舍不得了。IU的形体完全没有生育过孩子的样子。
809 伪中年危机题材，有趣的点在于，这个故事确实是为Nicolas Cage量身打造的，对于中年以上的观影者来说会有双重代入感。 不过正常的套路是“从头再来”，在这里变成了无厘头
本质上就是个神经病喜剧 想必能给凯奇的粉丝带来不少乐趣
片子里的亲情啊，友情啊其实发展都挺老套的，给片子加分绝对算不上，好在也没多减分。好玩的是凯奇对自己演艺生涯的调侃和致敬等等，联系现实会让人忍俊不禁，越了解凯奇劲儿越大。看凯奇叔这么拼，抱拳了，但真的不负当年勇了，这片明显佩德罗帕斯卡的表演更好。
很想知道为什么日本导演到中国拍片会有CCTV8电视剧的味道，韩国导演到中国拍片会有廉价恐怖片的味道。为什么是枝裕和拍《真相》是那样的，为什么是枝裕和拍《掮客》是这样的。是什么在影响跨地域的质感。
着重偏向喜剧的风格导致观众对漏洞百出的剧情和人物设定完全无法深究，平心而论，这个角色像是为小贱贱量身定做的，不管是电影的调性还是市场对他的定位，选择尼古拉斯凯奇更多是为了满足观众的猎奇心理，似乎大家就想在大荧幕看到当电影照进现实，曾经的好莱坞巨星在经历酗酒家暴偷税漏税等一系列丑闻导致信誉破产沦落到辗转在无数个粗制滥造的小成本电影疯狂刷脸捞钱还债，到现如今稍显真诚地自己饰演自己与过往告别的故事……感动吗？一般；好看吗？也一般，尼古拉斯凯奇乐在其中得在影片里自黑消费自己的模样，我仿佛在看《吐槽大会》
过期演员尼古拉斯凯奇变身CIA特工。前面半小时很无聊差点就放弃了，后面凯奇被招募协助CIA破案才稍微好看点，总体就一般般。
一些典型日式台词让韩风人物略感水土不服，故事里的角色走向都过于理想化，对买卖行为本身的辩解有些许暧昧。素英在剧中有三次眼前一黑的场景，特别是摩天轮场景，李知恩木讷粗糙的演绎可以说是毫无亮点，如果是裴斗娜演绎这个角色，一定会留下很深的记忆点。
为啥我感觉这片十分无聊？一点也看不进去。女人跟着人贩子一起找下家，过程中分享了各自经历，培养了感情的故事。 唯一一场还有点味道的是当第一对夫妻想买孩子，男的因为嫌弃孩子眉毛而想分期付款，还批评了几句。结果被女人狂怼“自己都长得獐头鼠目的还批评孩子长相”。
感觉节奏不太好，差几口气。这创意本应该更好一些。
可以预料的遗憾。依然受用于那种上路时角色间载着几分感动，却同样不免残忍的际遇；它也提供着偶尔有些温柔的片刻。在火热的生育议题讨论面前，它的视角与观点有些不可避免的“陈旧”；尤其在相近的地理区域里，能够想到最近的比照是《晨曦将至》；架设于非传统关系的家庭定义讨论、设置一个让人无从选择的道德矛盾，就明显更钟意与接受后者的展开。遗憾的还有整个卡司至多是各司其职，在不同的画面里述说着自己和角色的故事（当然直接给裴斗娜和李珠英开一个“《妙女神探》式”查案剧，我举双手赞成），却几乎捕捉不到之间更奇妙的火花——这是过往几部里都不太会发生的，或许也算一种“祛魅”吧。
如果是个日本片就觉得背景有点太复杂了，如果是个韩国片又觉得人与人之间的张力不够狠。。。可能大家不太接受的点就在这里吧，但这年头，有电影看就是值得庆祝的事情
是枝裕和有个强项，能把小场景对手戏拍的既有张力又十分细腻，这次的洗车间、忽明忽暗的火车隧道、摩天轮，都是角色转变的关键场景，而且他听不懂韩语，拍摄时的注意力应该会降低听觉权重，提高视觉权重，也就是盯表演。但是演员们表演都很游离，宋康昊也没什么发挥空间，怎么拿的戛纳影帝？当然，故事内核还是很好。
我想都有吧。
創作上重複和原地踏步了十幾年的是枝裕和這次露怯得厲害，投影展所好的劇情卻編織得想像不到的潦草，全員聖母的故事反倒令人感到了濃濃的虛假和偽善。
希望凯奇能再回巅峰！两位男主的演技无可挑剔
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
