Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
离开了A24，艾格斯再也不是一众80后导演里最不同的那一位了。
裸体午餐和欲望号快车的混合，这个概念我太爱了，虽然早有预料但还是意外的色情。柯南伯格快要走到极致了，真是爽啊，真是大快人心
看完有几个迷惑，第一个是这个片的成本为什么高达7000万？钱花哪里去了，看着还没有1000多万成本的绿衣骑士贵。第二是Eggers的灵气都去哪里了？前作里面大胆cult的元素和引人入胜的叙事都去哪里了，这个片里我看到的只是束手束脚和敷衍了事。PS，片长也有点太长，没有充沛的感情和充足的动机来支撑，显得片子又长又空洞。
哈姆雷特这套已经看腻了，亮点只有极具个人风格的视听，以及安雅的脸蛋和屁股。艾格斯趋于商业的一部，希望后续给力一点。
“我们在地狱之门见”
在《狗镇》（2003）中，格蕾丝·玛格丽特·穆利根（妮可·基德曼饰）被演员亚历山大·斯卡斯加德的父亲斯特拉恩·斯卡斯加德饰演的查克强奸。在电视剧《大小谎言》（2017）中，塞莱斯特·赖特（妮可·基德曼饰）被演员亚历山大·斯卡斯加德饰演的丈夫佩里·赖特虐待。在《北欧人》（2022）中，1967年出生的妮可·基德曼饰演Queen Gudrún，被1976年出生的亚历山大·斯卡斯加德饰演的儿子Amleth杀死。
从我自己看过的三部柯南伯格来说，我觉得他说的都是工业环境对于人的欲望或者更准确的来说、对性欲的异变。我也是直到这一部才看出点他的意图。这一部里面我非常喜欢他刻画的虚无感。每个人物对于物质狂热爱恋，却对道德处于一个无所谓的状态；但物质又反过来紧固了他们的感受器官，需要更加强大的刺激和插入才能刺激到他们；结果在高潮过后，感受器官又再一次堕入到僵硬。以此陷入到循环，便是无尽的虚无。
只要瓶子够新画面够美, 旧酒喝起来也很好！跟去年的麦克白感觉类似, 相比较而言更喜欢麦克白一些。希望商业片把northman的摄影当做基准…
身体的改造？器官的切除？艺术的解构？
3+，挣脱神话的启示和悲剧的束缚，勇敢去爱和战斗吧！
武装暴力版哈姆雷特的悲剧一生，无论用计谋还是改编的暴力，都免不了悲剧结尾，这或许也是命运。。 （安雅胸大臀小喔）
skrek mycket.
武装暴力版哈姆雷特的悲剧一生，无论用计谋还是改编的暴力，都免不了悲剧结尾，这或许也是命运。。 （安雅胸大臀小喔）
挺无聊的。 不过这几年的viking片已经把北欧人神话得为纳粹招魂了，这部算是反viking 神话的。
心理辅导全靠吼 应该组个北欧复仇者联盟 让e大一家子来演
three stars for the misrepresentation of shrooms
当我听到男主名的时候觉得就是哈姆雷特，然后事实上也确实是，真的有点困了，这种epic这样拍就不是很聪明，I mean 这得多老套啊？而且北欧viking风，确实挺brutal，savage的，真的，说陪葬就杀了，砍头就砍，挺不舒服的，里面祭天呀神棍呀镜头，就很cult，还有，虽然我喜欢🐶，但是这开头那段通灵我大二哈的镜头着实迷惑，我理解不了，我更理解不了的是他对峙母亲时那段，我真的what the hell？？？How could u？It doesn't ahhhh。另外这种目睹亲人然后当奴隶一步步复仇夺皇位，hello，Am I watching Gladiator？？？另外就是裸戏了，不知道是不是裸替，naked金发安雅，她真的挺好看的。但是男主是真的蠢，蠢猪一样，反正两边卧龙凤雏吧
三星儿半吧，摄影占了大部分。skarscard的三角肌也太夸张了。而且男主的设定是early to mid-twenties? skarscard演这个也太勉强了。人们本来都是我很喜欢的人们
7分。豆瓣评分为啥这么低？又一个王子复仇记的故事，据说是最早的原型。本来没什么特别的，但是加入了神话和奇幻元素后就有了特别的看点。后半段渐入佳境，特别是那些诡异的暴力元素，比如那匹颇具美感的sui肢组成的马，威廉·达福的干瘪tou颅，以及王子死时的野蛮ji祀场面，非常原始非常神秘。剧情没什么特别的，但导演的暗黑和超自然风格却是吸引观众的。这种风格从《女巫》到《灯塔》，再到这部电影，一直保留下来，十分可贵，电影需要不同的风格。况且，第一场大战的长镜头和调度都可圈可点。
依旧是影像盛宴，近年来瓦尔哈拉都快给电影演员占满时，艾格斯来了个莎剧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
