Future of Food In the past year, we have seen food riots on three continents, food inflation has rocketed and experts predict that by 2050, if things don't change, we will see mass starvation across the world. This film sees George Alagiah travel the world in search of solutions to the growing global food crisis. From the two women working to make their Yorkshire market town self-sufficient to the academic who claims it could be better for the environment to ship in lamb from New Zealand, George Alagiah meets the people who believe they know how we should feed the world as demand doubles by the middle of the century.
【India】
George joins a Masai chief among the skeletons of hundreds of cattle he has lost to climate change and the English farmer who tells him why food production in the UK is also hit. He spends a day eating with a family in Cuba to find out how a future oil shock could lead to dramatic adjustments to diets. He visits the breadbasket of India to meet the farmer who now struggles to irrigate his land as water tables drop, and finds out why obesity is spiralling out of control in Mexico.
Back in Britain, George investigates what is wrong with people's diets, and discovers that the UK imports an average of 3000 litres of water per capita every day. He talks to top nutritionist Susan Jebb, DEFRA minister Hilary Benn and Nobel laureate Rajendra Pachauri to uncover what the future holds for our food.
【Senegal】
George heads out to India to discover how a changing diet in the developing world is putting pressure on the world's limited food resources. He finds out how using crops to produce fuel is impacting on food supplies across the continents. George then meets a farmer in Kent, who is struggling to sell his fruit at a profit, and a British farmer in Kenya who is shipping out tonnes of vegetables for our supermarket shelves. He also examines why so many people are still dying of hunger after decades of food aid.
Back in the UK, George challenges the decision-makers with the facts he has uncovered - from Oxfam head of research Duncan Green to Sainsbury's boss Justin King. He finds out why British beef may offer a model for future meat production and how our appetite for fish is stripping the world's seas bare.
【Cuba】
In the final episode George Alagiah heads out to Havana to find out how they are growing half of their fruit and vegetables right in the heart of the city, investigates the 'land-grabs' trend - where rich countries lease or buy up the land used by poor farmers in Africa - and meets the Indian agriculturalists who have almost trebled their yields over the course of a decade.
George finds out how we in this country are using cutting-edge science to extend the seasons recycle our food waste and even grow lettuce in fish tanks to guarantee the food on our plates.
He hears the arguments about genetically modified food and examines even more futuristic schemes to get the food on to our plates.
我们的现在是先辈前仆后继换来的。我们要加油。
愿你所愿的永远
徐峥四星，沈腾三星，第一个最差，就这样吧，不喜欢滥煽情，相比前两个故事，更喜欢后面的喜剧，徐峥这个，男孩一出来就知道是谁导的，是徐峥导的几次单元片里最喜欢的一个了。不过麻花这个未来的故事，感觉不适合放到这个题材里面。比较好奇的一点，里面航天员、金融大厦是否真的有原型，不然有点尴尬
相比前两部缩减了故事数量，想通过时长的增加来丰满每一个故事的剧作，可惜反倒让4个导演暴露出了自身剧作把控力上的薄弱；最好的是章子怡的《诗》，虽然也存在着叙事和调度的短板，但相对来说情感表达以及表演是4个故事中最好的，总体来说观感逊色于前两部 ★★☆
这种命题作文还是徐铮最会玩。鸭先知>诗=少年行>乘风。
鸭先知最好，徐峥知道观众想要啥，故事最为完整。
徐峥跟另外三位明显已经不是一个梯队的了，愣是把三部短片拍成了连续剧，而且竟然学起了韦斯安德森，还学得有模有样的，虽然底有点泄气。这我就有点儿搞不懂了，你要是真有这个本事，为啥自己的囧系列拍的那么拉跨呢？另外三部真是各有各的烂法儿，但无一例外全都是父亲缺位（仨绝户）：吴京那部是拿自个儿儿子当炮灰使，就为了救一个寡妇，而且平原战用骑兵打炮兵，你就这么不心疼手里的兵吗？章子怡那部把自己的孩子扔给别人养就算了，还接力，你既然这样当初别生多好啊（我甚至怀疑她那个长镜头是徐峥拍的）；沈腾那部最可气，他内爸爸都不是个人，而且，雪健老都那么大岁数了，能让怹再遭这份儿罪了吗？
想创造
徐>沈>吴=章。虚的越多越扣分，实的越多越加分。实加巧，就是佳作了。
沈腾部分：故事烂到已经可以忽略标题了，开心麻花说到底就是个小品团队。
孕吐就像强迫症，你放纵自己它就有，你压抑下去它也没了，你以为忍着很难受，其实比发作起来舒服的多，你以为稍微释放点没关系，却一出笼就没完没了越来越重直至难受，能压的几天没有，也能催的24小时反胃。
四个单元，没一个感动的…骑马引飞机并且躲飞机机枪子弹？日本飞行员太平洋海战跟美国都打得难解难分，会傻到为两匹马钻小山坳？！八路军都占据高地把敌人给围起来打了，你们来个骑马砍刀冲战壕？！大清亡了？！火箭发动机那个无感，鸭先知跟沈腾马丽两段还凑合看，整体真的挺……七拼八凑的感觉
《诗》惊艳到我了，片尾曲不听的话绝对是损失
跟同侪相比，徐峥做导演的单元出格性优秀，甚至有点韦斯安德森那味儿。按理说，这是离真实生活质地最远的片段，却最能让我想起我的父亲，也是那个“总想折腾点什么却没折腾出什么名堂但就是跟周围的爸爸不一样”的鸭先知。
怪不得剧本这么烂拍得毫无镜头美感，全是一堆没有梦想的演员导的圈钱之作，也就徐峥能打一丢丢，但确实比之前两部的自己差了几百个章子怡。从头到尾都没有悬念，讲不好故事立不好人设，说好的科技片人文片怀旧片，结果都是群讲傻白甜的伪大片，港真，看这类无脑强吹片还不如看无脑傻白甜剧，起码不用感觉侮辱了知识。最后必须cue一下章子怡，真是用心良苦的女演员，赌上国际章的名誉用行动向大家证明: 演技是可以从有到无的。
我和我的系列拼盘3.0了，沈腾那一part和别的导演画风都不一样，都是行活儿，要不以后就别拍了吧…
徐峥的部分最有诚意，故事也最好看，沈腾的部分也不算太糟。这部电影看起来更像宣传片。
这次的命题作文，确实是章子怡《诗》更符合题意。徐峥的《鸭先知》最后点题，前半段的插科打诨倒也把勇于尝试的第一次呈现。而吴京的《乘风》过于煽情，饱满的情绪表达反而把中国传统的含蓄留白遗失了。沈腾的《少年行》虽然是想把传承寄于未来，但是把重点落在机器人身上反而偏离了主题。而且整部影片弱化了女性的付出，也是令人失望的。
全部星星都给徐峥，和其他三个篇章的气质都不一样，尽管只是低仿韦斯安德森。章子怡没有那么好，吴京沈腾完全看不下去
徐峥这一段的调调我很喜欢 但确实还是章子怡的更有电影感
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
