Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
老谋子还是老谋子。主旋律狠狠拿捏了。近几年抗美援朝主题最佳
说实话，成片质量看下来感觉还是蛮有说服力的，仿佛这个事情真的很有可能发生在飞机大炮冲刺的战场上。除去艺术加工后的细节，说真的。这个故事还是很有共情的几个瞬间。
北野武是94年出车祸才面瘫的，这电影74年也在模仿面瘫脸抽？请问导演是哪里有点问题吗？及其出戏的表演点。
北野武 克制 不煽情 但还是有感动到 笑点泪点都有 老年的北野武 化妆太过了
剧团老师情怀作，初看有点杂乱，后面慢慢用人情收回来，影帝实力cos面瘫大佬
不错，虽然只是一场很小的战场，但总归是用视觉再现了故事，故事简单但很抓人，确实是短小精悍了
中国终于有自己的像点样儿的狙击手的电影了
中规中矩很套路很普通，只有接电话得知师傅自杀和最后的长镜头稍微高于影片平均水平。
小场景，大情报；小人物，大英雄！至少在这一刻，我们都会记住你们，感恩～
唉，一日为师终身为父啊。结尾的长镜头让人联想起泰坦尼克号，斑驳凋零的景物重返光华，所有人都还是最好的年纪。第一次听浅草キッド还是北野武上ぴったんこカンカン的时候，原来背后有这样一个故事。
从法兰西特派到法兰西座……还是法兰西座能感动到人，特别是最后的长镜头中的浮光掠影，包含了许多书里（大书特书）的细节，实在是感动满满。而从是枝裕和《无人知晓》中走出的最年轻？戛纳影帝，童星出道的柳乐优弥，我记得也曾有一段沉沦的时日，对站在对立面的师傅来说，一个剧外人对剧内人的感同身受，对“时代”这个词，肯定也是五味杂陈。
不值四星，每个人物都刻画的很不错，片长也很适中，整体故事完整，凡事都怕个但是……但是美军两个头目不合差点狙杀指挥官，和最终志愿军连长来接人的场景对比太鲜明了，这个有必要么？坦克内两个美军的对话是什么鬼，这个部分的剧情设定太尴尬了，最终的政治正确丝毫没有意义，完全不如前半场的双方对战，各种人物情绪的表达显得丰满和真实，总的来说，三星可看
脱离于宏观大场面的战争片 聚焦于战术间的运筹帷幄和成长 以及小孩出现对人性的思考 带有中国式的理性和感性
大谋子把战争场面拍的很细腻，感人至深，小人物也是大英雄
以及，春节档片尾曲点睛之笔的，一个是雄狮少年，一个是这个「值得再➕一星」
非一般形式传记片，只是截取了北野武师从深见迈入谐星坦途这感人的一段，千里马遇到伯乐，伯乐引导的方式以及豁出脸面背后助推的苦心，实在触动人心，有对传统技艺的感慨，有对法兰西座的感怀，柳乐优弥竭力去演的半张脸，在重返的长镜头里，满含深情。
终于看得到每一个有名字的战士，终于台词不再是歌功颂德的咬文嚼字，终于不再狠狠煽情。狙击手对峙部分有头脑有技巧，虽然不是那种能够让人念念不忘的电影，但是也足够讲得上好。
其实前面真的麻麻的。最后那顿饭，火灾，加上浅草小子，眼睛还是酸了。
只能说是很常规很套路化的传记片，我都好奇北野武本人看了什么想法。
虽说拍在世名人的传记片难免有美化之嫌，但本片以初出道时与师父深刻的羁绊为基础，讲述了北野武一贯坚持自我的渊源，颇具说服力。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
