Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
十步杀一人，千里不留行
谢苗好适合这种角色，打戏也很精彩，希望可以拍成系列网大
多给半星给个鼓励，电影画面和色彩很棒，简单的快意恩仇故事
第3561-干着别的随便看的，美术不错，不知道是不是借鉴了《镖人》，剧情实在实在一般。
当年的谢苗都这么大了。
卯足了劲讲个故事，但终究做戏而已。太过于符号化，最终也就只留于形式。
大爽电影！武侠之光！
不管赢多少，能带走才是你的钱。杀一个人要偿命，杀一万人就不用了。恋爱中的白富美想要天上的星星，舔🐶去盗墓盗得大明珠奉上，又怕被嫌晦气杀了所有盗墓人，追杀逃跑的监工至家中杀了新婚妹妹的夫婿强奸了善良美丽勤劳致富的妹妹。有没有人心疼这里的世家门阀子弟，那么可怜要去做舔🐶依靠裙带关系稳固地位🐶🐶🐶，一点人格都没有，当然他还一点人样都没有。想起了张彻的电影，简单的行侠仗义的故事，虽然差点意思，当然现在也不推崇这样的行侠仗义，分分钟进去了。甩刀灭🔥那里真的帅了。
一个小时讲了一个完整的故事。美中不足的是琴娘这条线太弱了，有点像为了给演员加戏匆匆多写了几笔，从剧情上看这琴娘完全就是个大冤种。前传后传都挺好写，值得期待。
这些年看了谢苗好多网络电影，虽然剧情苍白，但是这次调度光影真的好。长篇评论排第一的那个写的很不错，谢苗团队借鉴一下。
男谢苗，女冬冬，鬼有彭禺厶。我们的电影正在蒸蒸日上哦!
低成本动作片里的成功之作，动作设计有接近韩国动作片水平，美术设计也不错。
简单，干脆，网大精品了，似乎比“电视电影”更好一些
暴力美学一气呵成，确实不需要什么复杂高端的故事。
没脑的少年很可怕，也很好骗······当然也很短命·······
演出的质感镜头的运用什么的都已经够了，但之所以感觉无功无过还是在故事上浅了。角色想活过来戏剧冲突又不够，看完感觉就是读了一篇没什么转折的故事，每个角色都没入味，都差那么点，就变成了啥也没看出来。不过谢苗的演出底子是真的很不错，可以再精进！
虽说是致敬座头市，但剧本还是挺糙的，倒是不难看，难得有部武术设计在线的片子
导演有强迫症吧哈哈哈 构图太好看了 武戏也很不错 剧情比较简单
难得的武侠剧，造型和电影质感都喜欢，唯一不足就是剧情可以再扩展开，单调了点
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
