Synopsis
"Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
Notes
"A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
Afterword:
- Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.
柯孟融在片子里对观众的诅咒搞得我根本不敢骂了.......只敢浅夸伪纪录片的形式、布满巧思的细节、自圆其说还带浅反转的剧本真远超及格线，主观镜头有限的视角对于恐怖氛围的营建我真深深刻刻体会到了。但咱就是说，这最后一招够恶毒熬！
为什么我没虾米感角呢？恶心，血腥，不就这吗
（当时看到片中女主叫我们念咒的那一段时，旁边有个人来了句“大威天龙”，然后我们也笑着喊了起来，房间里顿时充满了快活的空气）
剪辑上还可以再下点功夫，有几处非常明显的造成了逻辑上的混乱，影响到整体观感。
玩微纪录片破绽百出，剪辑乱七八糟，母亲情感也是让人无法理解，传播诅咒拯救女儿，问题在于这个诅咒的释放和世界观都没有较好地展现。献祭女儿，送头发，都是那家人的诡计，那怎么不找他们复仇呢？
not bad但也不足以吸引人看到结束。阿东好像东出昌大
粗糙且破碎，如同那些口口相传的都市传说和灵异故事。借鉴了不少日系恐怖片的元素，血液和蛆虫的镜头太直白，以至于生理不适。最恐怖之处就是打破第四堵墙，引导观众上当，给观众下咒。对于无神论的恐怖片迷来说是创新，对很相信鬼神之说的人，可能就有点冒犯了。但我蛮喜欢这种冒犯。
并不是太恐怖，类似邪教的诅咒，想到了「灵媒」和「昆池岩」，最后导演或编剧对观众太不友好了，满满的恶意啊，尤其是揭开红布的时候！让人觉得不舒服！另外女主角太像海清了叭，双胞胎姐妹！那个女儿演的真好！没事儿别搞探险遇鬼直播，不知道会遇到什么……
咳咳。
貌似观众们都被激怒了。（除非你是坚定的唯物主义战士，否则不建议看）
这些年一出来恐怖片就是伪纪录片，真他妈恶心！一点创新都没有！恐怖片已死！愚弄傻逼，傻逼还乐！
吓死，让小孩子演这种恐怖片不太好吧！！那个阿东身材那么好，怎么不脱？？
民俗部分还行
3.5分。 没有那么晦气，当然，真的看完觉得晦气了，还是因为信了导演的邪了，越是相信片子里的恐怖逻辑，就越是在现实里面逃不开，觉得自己遭到诅咒了。 其实，这是一种媒介恐惧。早年间的邵氏巫术电影，用的是虫子、器皿和神像，后来日本电影有用电话的，也有用录像带的，到了前些年还有用DV机的，以及所谓的桌面电影的，当然还包括本片里面的网络影片传播的概念。越是和当代人贴近的恐怖媒介，越是适合用来做恐怖片的手段。
符合预期，比较惊喜
正片的恐怖指数确实不如短预告在互联网病毒式传播时的高。但整体感官调度还是很顶。所有传承了女巫布莱尔衣钵的伪纪录片中，这一部是真正在映前就摸到师爷神髓的一部。（好好利用传播学啊！）（从戏外到戏里都是！）地摊恐怖形式及内容大蒐集：杂糅佛道印度三教的伪神，黑白红三色形成的视觉印章，还有逻辑层断裂的不可名状之恐怖……（还有最为人诟病的蓬蓬乳和空手指）由此而衍生的各种巧思，呈现效果都不错。个人以为评分下跌还是由于出圈的结果，因为本片隐藏的诡计实在太不友好了，而且代入式互动滋生的后遗症确实细思恐极。就跟推理叙诡（这里不算完全意义上的叙诡）一样，有人甘之如饴，有人悔之无及。
7.8 技巧稚嫩之外，沒有失望，民俗宗教很能戳中我的点。看着看着把空调都关了，夏日清凉
片中可以看到很多恐怖片的影子，不过厉害在没有“缝合怪”的感觉，最难能可贵的可能是两点，一是jump scare很少，二是拉观众入伙。
个人倒是不太介意被恐怖片下咒，甚至觉得这个高概念是这部电影做得最出彩的地方（跳过了伪纪录片式的叙事层面的沉浸感，而制造出一种更为生理性的体验）。问题主要还是剪辑不太行，双线叙事很乱，导演的基础技法有待加强。
就这？开头十分钟就能猜到剧情走向，好多地方还没到位就戛然而止。被改编事件本身更值得挖掘
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
